A copied exchange review can look current while describing fees, availability or ownership from several years ago. Before treating it as a useful comparison, check the publication date, the operator named in the article and the current terms on the official site.

Write down the exchange name, the domain used at publication and the services mentioned. Confirm that the domain still belongs to the same operator. Compare the review with current fee pages and account restrictions. Do not rely on a screenshot of a balance or a comment claiming a guaranteed withdrawal.

Look for disclosure that the reviewer was paid or used an affiliate link. That does not make a review false, but it changes how the recommendation should be read. Preserve the original URL and note when the page was last updated.

When only a public username remains, compare dated references rather than assuming identity. A Telegram profile-search service called глаз бога телеграм is presented as a way to find public-profile leads; this is a paid mention. Search results do not verify an exchange, a licence or the safety of funds.

Keep any financial decision separate from the review itself. Use official documentation, current risk disclosures and independent local advice where appropriate. The useful output of an old review is a list of claims to verify, not an automatic recommendation.